Every 12 months, the Cannes Film Festival offers a primary have a look at a number of the most ambitious movies soon to be released, with a deal with the art moderately than the commerce of cinema. (Don't be fooled, behind-the-scenes motion can also be a key element of the festival.) But something about this 12 months's festival, which concluded on Saturday, left a bitter taste. The filmmakers looked as if it would have lost touch with reality. The Issue from festival staff about unfair working conditions were barely mentioned by US journalists. And the smug way through which the celebrity industrial complex carried on as if nothing on this planet was flawed felt…flawed.
At least that's the way it was for me after I saw it within the US. Many of the movies are apparently pretty good. I won't write about that here because I haven't seen them yet. What I can comment on, nonetheless, is the mood and general feeling of cluelessness that got here out of the festival this time.
Writing for the Hollywood Newsletter The ankleClaire Atkinson found that just about everyone she spoke to “at rooftop parties, on the street, in hotel lobbies where the see-and-be-seen thing was, or even on the phone, said the same thing: This is the year the excitement about movies has returned.”
That could also be wishful pondering. The star-studded press conferences and red carpets went on as usual. But “the movies” as we all know them are in an existential crisis. What type of cinematic life is destined for each film? Director Sean Baker expressed this fear when he presented the Top price Palme d'Or for his romantic comedy “Anora”. The world, he said, “needs to be reminded that watching a film at home while scrolling through your phone, checking emails and half-listening is simply not the way to go, despite what some technology companies would like us to believe. Watching a film with others in the cinema is one of the greatest communal experiences.”
Unfortunately, box office numbers tell a unique story. The partitions across the industry are crumbling, however the parties on yachts have continued unabated and the professional forma standing ovations after screenings have been dutifully timed and reported by journalists as if the data meant something.
A serious concern of the strikes in Hollywood last 12 months was the specter of AI. However, that was not felt in Cannes, where a producer was readily available with a “sizzle reel of AI-translated trailers of international films.” accordingly The Hollywood Reporter noted that the technology is an “opportunity for hit international films to inexpensively produce a high-quality English-language dub that makes them more attractive to the global market.” That's bad news for actors who make a living dubbing foreign movies. And it gets worse. Also in the marketplace was a biopic about Vladimir Putin that uses AI to place Putin's face on an actor, making a deep fake. The film's Polish director, Patryk Vega, also referred to as Besaleel, told the Hollywood Reporter that he predicts that “eventually, film and television productions will only employ lead and perhaps supporting actors, while the entire world of supporting and minor characters will be created digitally.” Perhaps Cannes will simply introduce a brand new awards category called the AI d'Or in the approaching years.
Let us turn to the filmmakers who still do it the old-fashioned way. Francis Ford Coppola brought his $120 million allegory of our times, “Megalopolis,” which was years within the making, to Cannes within the hope of finding a buyer. At his press conference he said noticed“The answer (to our nation's problems) is not the people who become politicians, but the artists of America.” A grand statement. But if he really believes that, who does he think will finance and distribute movies that challenge and criticize the very systems that truly profit the studios? (Coppola is an outsider who’s wealthy enough to finance his latest film himself.)
What was conspicuously missing from most reports about Coppola: Only days before, a report surfaced that the filmmaker of “The Godfather” and “Apocalypse Now” had behaved inappropriately in the course of the filming of some scenes of “Megalopolis”. According to The guard: “Coppola came on set and attempted to kiss some of the topless and scantily clad female extras, apparently claiming he wanted to 'get them in the mood.'”
Other producers sold an motion thriller with James Franco. Two years ago accomplished a category motion lawsuit filed by former acting students who claim to have been sexually exploited by him. The presence of LaBeouf and Franco prompted diversity to ask, “Has anyone really been cancelled at Cannes?” The Ankler's Atkinson quoted a culture editor at a French television station who said 75% of the movies at this 12 months's festival had a female protagonist “who seeks revenge, fights back and finds her place.” How does that square with Cannes welcoming men who put real women in these situations?
Meanwhile, Cate Blanchett was on the festival to advertise a black comedy called “Rumours,” which is about heads of state who literally wander away within the woods. interviewshe spoke in regards to the ongoing lack of ladies behind the camera: “There are 50 people on set and three women. It's like that's finally changing in a fundamental way.” Her concern sounds unfounded: Blanchett is a top talent who’s more likely to play a key role in getting funding – if she believes things need to vary, she could start by utilizing her own influence.
Even the red carpet – often photographed for its supposed glamour – had an unsightly touch this 12 months. Singer Kelly Rowland attended a premiere and was rudely dragged up the steps by an usher who held her arm out behind Rowland as a barrier, as if she were a bouncer escorting a violent guest off the premises. Afterward, Rowland said, “There were other women on the carpet who didn't look quite like me, and they weren't verbally abused, pushed off or told to leave.” The same usher was later filmed aggressive with at the very least three other Womenand even went thus far address physically one among them.
The festival has long cultivated a culture of elitism and exclusion, as Deadline critics Valerie Complex put it this fashion when she wrote about her experience a couple of years ago as one among the few black writers in attendance. The microaggressions, she said, were constant: “I sat down in a reserved row, and three different ushers came to my seat to check my ticket and make sure I was in the right seat. They didn't check anyone else's tickets, just mine.”
Let's end on a positive note, because there was a brilliant spot on the festival this 12 months: one other dog that won everyone's heart. Last 12 months's winner of the Palm Dog (an actual award) was Messithe dog in “Anatomy of a Fall”. This 12 months the honour went to a mixed breed named Kodi, who appears within the Swiss-French film “Dog in Court”, a legal drama a couple of lawyer who takes on a dog that has bitten three people as a client. The story is outwardly loosely based on a real case in France.
If Cannes goes to the dogs, at the very least there are real dogs there to lighten the mood.
image credit : www.mercurynews.com