Plant-Based Meat Alternatives Attempt to Emerge from the Culture Wars – An Impossible Task?

Vegans, vegetarians and others in search of meat alternatives are increasingly seeing a brand new option on the menu: patties that look, taste and it even appears to be bleeding like beef hamburgers, but are literally made out of soy, pea protein and other ingredients.

Now a number one plant-based meat company has called Impossible foods plans to rebrand to achieve a wider audience.

Impossible Foods says that any longer all of its green cardboard packaging will probably be switched to red to “appeal to the carnivorous cravings of meat eaters,” based on a Press release from March 2024.

Well-known brands for plant-based meat alternatives akin to Impossible Foods and Beyond Meat lose income at an alarming pace. Several brands, akin to the vegan chicken nugget brand Nowadays, are go bankrupt. And Impossible Foods' The value of personal stocks has fallen by 89% since 2021.

Some of the plant-based meat substitute industry's problems stem from politics. Many Consumers associate plant-based meat substitutes with veganism, animal rights activism and left-wing politics.

Impossible CEO Peter McGuinness said in 2023 that his company had an elite status and that the corporate will probably be renamed is a rejection of “wokeness.” The so-called “wokeness” of Impossible and other plant-based meat substitutes shows what symbolic power food can have in politics.

As a communication scientist, We study and teach our students concerning the persuasive power of symbols. Even innocuous things just like the food we eat are symbols related to meanings and values.

Amid highly polarized politics within the United States, plant-based meat substitutes and their analogue, “real” meat, have turn into weapons in a symbolic political battle between some conservatives and liberals, sometimes nicknamed “The.” “Meat culture war.” In other words, while an Impossible Burger might literally be a soy patty, it is also a symbolic threat to the right-wing ideological order, a symbolic substitute for the left-wing “villain of the week.”

Green and white bags say “Impossible” on them and they are stacked in green boxes that also say “Impossible.”
Impossible burger patties within the freezer section of a Costco in Florida.
Lindsey Nicholson/UCG/Universal Images Group via Getty Images

Food, politics and culture

While costs vary, products are plant-based Meat industry can costs two to thrice as much as animal meat.

Most often it’s individuals with higher incomes, who’re younger and live within the suburbs I probably tried plant-based meat Replacement players, as Gallup polls show. A rural corner store in Mississippi probably won't sell Impossible sausages, but an urban California Whole Foods will. probably will.

In some cases, conservatives attach much more importance to plant-based meat substitutes. Conservative pundit Tucker Carlson, for instance, offered one Documentary in 2022 with the Raw Egg Nationalist, a outstanding far-right influencer, who said that Impossible, Beyond and other plant-based corporations were a part of a “soyglobalist” conspiracy to criminalize meat consumption and weaken residents through poisoned food. The Raw Egg Nationalist also wrote in 2022 that plant-based meat substitutes and eggs are used are “perverse” products pushed by elites to bring civilization “to the brink of madness.”

The political symbolism of food just isn’t latest. Depiction of East Asian men as “effeminate rice eaters” served as a justification for European colonial rule in Asia within the nineteenth century and later served to fuel anti-immigrant sentiment within the United States. And in the course of the Iraq War within the mid-2000s, some U.S. restaurants renamed “French fries” to “French fries.” “Freedom Fries” to protest France's refusal to affix the war.

More recently, some people have derided men who devour soy-based proteins “Soy boys.” In response to calls for meat reduction, Iowa Senator Joni Ernst said Has suggested Ban the Meatless Monday trend to combat the left’s “war on meat.”

“Impossible’s” appeal to the political right probably won’t be solved with a fast repackaging. This is because their problem is expounded to a deep-rooted conspiracy ideology held by some people right-wing extremist political circles.

Secure, some studies Research from consumer psychology suggests that brand color influences consumer preferences. Especially with plant-based meat Consumer perception The environmental friendliness and taste of the product are partly influenced by the colour of the packaging – on this case typically green. There could also be a color shift “nudge” A stubborn carnivore trying an Impossible brat, but that's a bandage, not an answer.

You are what you eat

The symbolic connection between eating the “right” foods and American political identity is powerful.

During the 2012 election, the political analyst was Dave Wasserman argued who controls the Senate would boil all the way down to Cracker Barrel guests who are inclined to prefer options like chicken and dumplingscountry-roasted steak and meatloaf, in comparison with Whole Foods shoppers.

He accurately noted that precincts that included Whole Foods were more prone to vote blue, while precincts with Cracker Barrels were more prone to vote red. Ten years later, in summer 2022, Social media was raging when Cracker Barrel offered an Impossible sausage patty on its menu.

Some people then posted on Cracker Barrel's Facebook site, insults the restaurant chain. As one person wrote, “We don't eat at an old country store for burgers.”

Plant-based meat substitutes are sometimes utilized by conservative commentators as a symbolic substitute for “big government” and viewed as a threat to individual freedom.

At the 2019 Conservative Political Action Conference, Republican Senator Ted Cruz said explained his wish “Seeing PETA supporting the Republican Party now that the Democrats want to kill all the cows.” At a 2020 rally in Des Moines, Iowa, then-President Donald Trump Throw the anti-meat Conspiracy in much more nefarious and illogical terms: “They want to kill our cows!” You know why, right? … That means you’re next.”

In 2021 a Survey found that 44% of Republicans actively consider there may be a “movement to ban red meat” within the US.

One ad calls it
Burger King is one in every of the chain restaurants selling the vegan Impossible Burger.
Yichuan Cao/NurPhoto via Getty Images

A bigger conspiracy

These fears overlap with populism right-wing conspiracy theory of “The Great Reset,” meaning the idea that wealthy “elites” weaken residents—particularly white men—as a way to subject them to tyrannical control and subjugation.

A Article 2023 in The American Conservative argued that Impossible is on the forefront of a “collective vegan madness that has gripped our media and political classes… not to persuade people, but to compel them.” In the net backlash to Cracker Barrel's latest Impossible sausage articles are just like some commenters recommended that Cracker Barrel’s “5G sausages” were controlled by Bill Gates.

psychology and Gender scholarship has found that “traditional” types of masculinity related to right-wing ideologies correlate with high meat consumption. Right-wing men devour beef in larger quantities and more steadily than other population groups.

As communications scholars, we’re convinced that Impossible is incapable of packaging in a way that pulls right-wing carnivores. The meat culture wars won't end due to red packaging or meaty descriptions. They will only end when other things are collectively perceived as an identity threat and a globalist conspiracy and other people ignore fake meat.

image credit :