Elon Musk's social media platform X has a gaggle of Advertisersand claimed that a “massive advertising boycott” had cost the corporate billions in lost revenue and violated antitrust laws.
The company formerly referred to as Twitter filed the lawsuit on Tuesday in a federal court in Texas against the World Federation of Advertisers and its member firms Unilever, Mars, CVS Health and Orsted.
She accused the promoting group's initiative, the so-called Global Alliance for Responsible Media, of helping to coordinate an promoting break after Musk bought Twitter for $44 billion in late 2022 and has revised its personnel and policies.
Musk posted in regards to the lawsuit on X on Tuesday, saying “now it's war” after two years of being nice and “getting nothing but empty words.”
In a video announcement, X CEO Linda Yaccarino said the lawsuit is predicated partially on evidence uncovered by the U.S. House Judiciary Committee that showed a “group of companies organized a systematic illegal boycott” against X.
The Republican-led committee held a hearing last month to think about whether current laws are “sufficient to prevent anticompetitive collusion in online advertising.”
The allegations within the lawsuit relate to the early days of Musk's Twitter takeover and never to a more moderen dispute with advertisers that arose a yr later.
In November 2023, a few yr after Musk bought the corporate, quite a few advertisers began leaving X over concerns that their ads might appear alongside pro-Nazi content and hate speech on the positioning basically. Musk also fueled tensions together with his own posts supporting an anti-Semitic conspiracy theory.
Musk later said the fleeing advertisers were engaging in “extortion” and essentially told them – using an euphemism – to go away.
image credit : www.cnbc.com