Should you want Americans to listen to climate change, just call it climate change

You’ve probably heard phrases like “climate crisis,” “climate emergency,” or “climate justice” more often recently as people try to speak the urgent risks and consequences of climate change. Danger is realbut is using this language actually convincing?

It seems that Americans are more knowledgeable about – and more concerned about – climate change and global warming than they’re in regards to the climate crisis, the climate emergency, or climate justice. The most up-to-date survey we conducted with a nationally representative sample of 5,137 Americans.

Furthermore, we found no evidence that the choice conditions increased people's sense of urgency, willingness to support climate-friendly policies, or willingness to act.

The familiar terms – climate change and global warming – generated at the least as much concern, a way of urgency and a willingness to act as climate crisis and climate emergency, sometimes much more. Climate justice, however, consistently performed worse, probably since it was the least well-known. Republicans, Democrats and independents reacted similarly.

Just do it

In our work as Research Psychologistswe examined how Americans reply to the best way climate change is communicated and discovered the necessity to use clear language.

For example, the people we interviewed for a study published in 2021 believed that climate experts were talk over their heads with terms like “adaptation,” “mitigation,” “sustainability,” and “carbon removal.” They wanted experts to make use of more familiar terms as an alternative.

This inspired us to jot down a brief guide to climate jargon, published in The Conversation. Using on a regular basis language makes information easier to know and even highly educated people prefer it.

Yet experts often use complex jargon because they’re aware of it, and so they may not realize that others are unfamiliar with it.

How the terms have developed

It has turn into common to discuss climate change and global warming as in the event that they had the identical meaning, but There are differencesThe term “climate change” refers to changes in the general climate, while global warming refers specifically to rising temperatures.

A historical review found that previously, people associated the term climate change less with the concept that humans are actively warming the planet than with the term global warming. Perhaps that is why Democrats used to just like the term global warming, while the popularization of the term climate change courtesy of Frank Luntz, an advisor to George W. Bush Administration.

Past surveys also found that Democrats considered global warming more serious than climate change, while Republicans considered climate change more serious than global warming. But after a recent reviewHowever, these partisan differences have now faded, with a majority of Republicans and Democrats expressing concern about each terms.

Alternative terms reminiscent of climate crisis, climate emergency and climate justice have been used to focus on other features of climate change and lift concern. In 2019, the British newspaper The Guardian The terms “climate crisis” and “climate emergency” were used to specific urgency.

With the term climate justice, activists draw attention to climate change as a human rights challenge: low-income people worldwide suffer probably the most from the implications of climate change, although they’re the least chargeable for it.

Conclusion: Avoid overheated language

Currently, the terms “climate crisis”, “climate emergency” or “climate justice” are less common and cause less concern than “climate change” or “global warming”.

Even if these terms are used more continuously, there isn’t a guarantee that they are going to increase concern or encourage motion. In fact, studies have shown that expressions reminiscent of climate crisis could backfire in the event that they don't resonate with people.

Our advice: Don't make the error of using heated language. Stick to familiar terms that individuals understand. For example, use “global warming” whenever you mean rising temperatures and “climate change” whenever you're referring to general changes within the climate.

image credit : theconversation.com