LOS ANGELES — A baffling hypothesis is gaining momentum amongst scientists: The universe could also be teeming with microscopic black holes the dimensions of an atom but with the mass of an asteroid the dimensions of a city.
These hypothetical black holes would have formed only a fraction of a second after the Big Bang and would zip silently through the solar system every few years or so, traveling greater than 100 times faster than a bullet.
Some even claim that a large explosion that a Siberian forest razed to the bottom in 1908 might have been the results of the impact of considered one of these micro black holes on Earth.
Now researchers say they’ve found a approach to test whether these cosmic balls actually exist.
In a study published Tuesday within the journal Physical Review D, MIT physicists say the existence of a tiny black hole hurtling through the solar system might be detected by a mild gravitational nudge it might exert on Earth and other planets, changing their orbits by not more than a number of meters.
The possibility of proving the existence of micro-black holes is causing great excitement amongst some astrophysicists, because it could solve a mystery that has puzzled them for nearly a century: the character and composition of dark matter.
In the Nineteen Thirties, astronomers noticed anomalies within the motion of galaxies. In the dark and empty vastness of intergalactic space, something was lurking that was generating enormous amounts of gravity and tugging at galaxies – but it surely looked as if it would refuse to interact with light or every other force.
Scientists have discovered this mysterious gravitational pull in every single place. To explain it, they suspected that it was brought on by invisible mass or dark matter, which is roughly 85% of all matter within the universe.
Some physicists have suggested that dark matter might be made up of exotic, previously undiscovered particles. Others, just like the MIT researchers, consider that dark matter might be just normal matter that is incredibly difficult to detect. And black holes, the researchers say, are a primary example of dark matter's properties.
“It's just fantastic that the most conceptually conservative answer is to say, 'They're just supersmall black holes that formed a fraction of a second after the Big Bang,'” said David Kaiser, a physics professor at MIT and writer of the study.
“It's not about inventing new forms of matter that haven't been discovered yet. It's not about changing the laws of gravity,” he said.
However, black holes usually are not the one possible culprits and there continues to be great debate on this area.
In the seek for dark matter, physicists have been searching for recent exotic particles, but in addition for bizarre matter that will have been ignored – reminiscent of black holes of various sizes. So far, they’ve come up empty-handed.
Until now, astronomers weren't sure the right way to seek for black holes of a very troublesome size – those which can be too small for his or her gravity to bend starlight.
The MIT researchers concluded through model calculations that these tiny black holes could have been formed from inclusions of dense matter that collapsed immediately after the Big Bang.
The researchers simulated what might occur if considered one of these primordial black holes passed throughout the orbit of Jupiter. They found that the orbits of Earth, Mars, Venus and Mercury could deviate by as much as one meter from their original course inside a decade.
The researchers said they expect a black hole impact to occur anywhere from yearly to once a century, depending on the frequency and mass of black holes.
To reassure themselves, the researchers also calculated the probability that considered one of these tiny black holes would hit the Earth. They found that this might only occur about once in a billion years.
Even then, the black hole wouldn’t result in an apocalypse.
Instead, it might pass directly through the Earth, leaving the planet relatively undisturbed.
Scientists within the Nineteen Seventies even showed that a black hole impact would look strikingly much like a streak of sunshine and explosion over Russia 116 years ago that scientists consider was brought on by a small asteroid or comet. (Although a black hole would also leave an “exit wound.”)
Proving the existence of small black holes requires extremely precise measurements of the position of planets and models of their suspected locations. Fortunately, scientists have the tools needed to realize this.
NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory in La Cañada Flintridge, for instance, has created an in depth model of the solar system which uses Albert Einstein's general theory of gravity to calculate the expected orbits of the planets and accounts for a whole bunch of asteroids in great detail. (They've even calculated how the tides of Earth's oceans affect the orbit of the moon.)
NASA scientists have also developed a particularly precise technique of determining the space between Earth and Mars. By measuring the time it takes for radio signals to travel from Earth to a spacecraft orbiting Mars or to a rover on its surface, scientists can calculate the red planet's distance from Earth. inside two feet.
“We've only had this level of precision for a few decades,” Kaiser said. “Thanks to a series of space missions, we can be concerned if Mars deviates 50 centimeters from the expected position.”
To persuade the skeptics, scientists would also must prove that the impact was not brought on by a passing asteroid.
The researchers say the speed of the black holes – which can be greater than twice that of every other object in our solar system – would create an unmistakable, unique fluctuation within the planets' orbits.
And astronomers are pretty good at detecting objects with a mass much like that of hypothetical black holes. In 2017, researchers identified the primary object from one other star to enter our solar systemwhich might have far less mass than a microscopic black hole.
Whether or not they detect a passing black hole, scientists say it is going to advance humanity's understanding of dark matter.
“Of course I would love to discover dark matter in the solar system,” said Benjamin Lehmann, a postdoctoral fellow at MIT and writer of the study. “But if this kind of observation helps us close that window and say that dark matter is not in the form of these primordial black holes, that is really important information.”
By proposing a way to simply test this possibility, “they … did exactly what we should do in the search for dark matter,” said Vera Gluscevic, a cosmology professor at USC who was not involved within the study. “We should leave no stone unturned.”
Scientists wish to further refine their models of planetary motion and search through historical observations from the past many years for signs of black holes. But crucial test is to easily wait and observe.
___
©2024 Los Angeles Times. Visit www.latimes.com. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.
image credit : www.mercurynews.com