The frustrated government can only bite its tongue because it waits for Michele Bullock

Reading the economic commentators, Reserve Bank Governor Michele Bullock might, in moments of doubt, ponder whether she is making the same misjudgment as her predecessor, Philip Lowe.

Lowe fell into disrepute attributable to some bad calls. He had signaled that the bank would keep rates of interest low for longer than turned out to be the case.

There's an enormous debate occurring now about whether Bullock and the bank are incorrect of their view that rates of interest shouldn't be cut “in the near future.”

But that's a debate Treasurer Jim Chalmers won't be engaging in, despite talking up Australia's weak economy this week following the discharge of national accounts on Wednesday.

It's no secret that the federal government is impatient for a rate cut and is frustrated that there isn't one. But she will be able to't say that because that will result in attacks; she put pressure on the independent bank.

A number of months ago, Chalmers declared that prime rates of interest would “crush” the economy. Despite the incontrovertible fact that he had made this point before, it became a significant headline, fueling a wild news cycle. Chalmers learned a very important lesson: even stating the plain might be politically dangerous.

Others are direct. Pradeep Philip, head of Deloitte Access Economics, said: “The private sector is in ruins and we would be in recession if there was no government spending. Australia has been in a per capita income recession for some time. The need for fiscal sustainability is stronger than ever and the case for cutting rates is clear.”

ACTU secretary Sally McManus was blunt this week. “Central banks in almost all advanced economies have already started cutting their official cash interest rates – and it’s time for Australia’s central bank to do the same.”

The bank will not be expected to look favorably on calls for a cut at its meeting next week. The argument continues to be that inflation must fall further before a secure and sustainable reduction can occur. However, the bank's language is being fastidiously monitored for signs of weakening.

Its critics claim, variously, that the bank's considering is flawed – particularly the idea that unemployment must proceed to rise to bring inflation to the appropriate level required to chop rates of interest – or that it has backed itself right into a corner Because Bullock had previously slacked there this yr there could be no cut.

Weeks ago, expectations of a rate cut were pushed back well into 2025. A government with its back against the wall is hoping (but not necessarily expecting) that Wednesday's figures could bring this forward to early next yr.

Hardline Labor parties imagine a cut wouldn’t make a major difference to the federal government's low popularity. However, they imagine it might show voters there may be light at the tip of the tunnel.

Meanwhile, Chalmers was forced again this week to argue that while individuals are hurting, “Australians would be much worse off and the growth of our economy would be even weaker without our responsible and balanced approach to the budget and without our Cost of “living”.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese talks about his second term agenda, but Labor may have to rely heavily on the perceived dangers posed by a Dutton government when drawing up campaign lines. His focus groups are designed to indicate that folks actually imagine they might be worse off under Dutton. Voters are disillusioned with the federal government but don’t imagine change is risk-free.

Expect to listen to lots about how Dutton tackled Medicare as Health Minister (on the time). How he never supports wage increases. How he didn't support the living allowance.

With an indignant electorate, Labour's negative campaign, nevertheless unedifying, often is the neatest thing for Labour.

Dutton has to date been successful in his attack lines against Labor, delivering them sharply and clearly, while keeping the opposition a comparatively small goal with only a couple of popular policy offerings (e.g. on social media and gambling reform).

But the more he presents guidelines, the more vulnerable he becomes. And as Labor uncovers electoral gifts, Dutton is forced to make unpleasant decisions.

He has promised to quantify the associated fee of his nuclear policy before Christmas, exposing him to more criticism over an option that many experts consider unrealistic. However, nuclear power is more likely to be a secondary issue because it is barely a blue sky in relation to Australia's immediate energy needs. Voters are interested by their electric bills in the subsequent yr or two, not a long time.

Albanese has indicated that he may have to make some big policy announcements over the summer, starting this month. One of those is more likely to be an expanded childcare policy, the ultimate type of which continues to be being determined. The other stays strictly under wraps.

The Australian Financial Review reported this week that the federal government is “considering” one other round of discounts on electricity bills to take into the election. It looks as if an obvious promise, and the coalition would have to make a decision how one can reply to it.

The coalition's weak underbelly can be its alternative economic policies, as there isn’t any easy way out of Australia's malaise.

It is argued that government spending is simply too high and is crowding out the private sector. But when it finally says (and it could actually't be unimaginable to not say) what it might cut, that can cause a backlash. Simply explaining that this is able to cut public services will not be enough.

The coalition says we want to extend productivity. But how does that work? When it involves reversing changes in industrial relations, that is dangerous territory during an election campaign.

On Thursday the Productivity Commission called on “ordinary Australians” to provide you with ideas to spice up productivity. “We are looking for practical policy ideas from people from all walks of life on how Australia can work smarter, more efficiently and more productively,” Commission Chair Danielle Wood said.

Maybe people can copy Dutton into their emails to the Commission.

A budget for March 25 is already being worked on within the depths of the bureaucracy and within the offices of the treasurer and finance minister, which, depending on the timing of Albanese's election, may never be presented.

There are different opinions throughout the Labor Party in regards to the benefits and drawbacks of starting the campaign on a budget. It allows the federal government to formulate its thrust and dominate the beginning of the election campaign. But the controversy can get bogged down in the small print and reveal the grim numbers.

Back on the Reserve Bank, Chalmers last week saw his bill establishing a brand new monetary board passed as a part of an agreement with the Greens. He intends to maneuver all current board members to the currency board, except for individuals who elect to serve on the bank's governing body. That means he has some vacancies on the Monetary Committee to fill.

The first meeting of the Monetary Committee is scheduled for March 31 to April 1. If there isn’t any rate cut before then, is it possible that the brand new board could make its first big decision, a rate cut, on April Fools' Day?

image credit : theconversation.com