Why Europe's trade agreement with South America is so controversial

The European Union's blockbuster trade take care of South America's Mercosur bloc is widely seen as highly controversial, with EU member states divided over terms and plenty of fearing one other flashpoint for farmers.

After 25 years of talks, the EU and five South American countries – Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay, Paraguay and, more recently, Bolivia – signed an agreement Landmark Trade agreement on December sixth, laying the inspiration for considered one of the most important free trade zones on the planet.

The transatlantic partnership is appreciated It is anticipated to cover an area of ​​greater than 700 million people and account for around 20% of worldwide gross domestic product.

The deal, which goals to ease trade between the 2 blocs by cutting tariffs on a variety of products, now requires the approval of the EU Parliament and a professional majority of 15 member states.

Analysts expect a rocky ratification process as farmers and a few EU member states warn it could lead on to unfair competition for European agriculture.

France, the second largest economy within the Eurozone, is vehemently against itwhile countries reminiscent of Poland, Italy, Austria and the Netherlands have all expressed reservations.

Germany, which strongly supports a deal, is amongst a bloc of 10 other member states calling on European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen to quickly ratify the ultimate terms.

“I think the first thing we need to do is be cautious given the fact that we've been here before,” Mariano Machado, chief Americas analyst at Verisk Maplecroft, told CNBC via video call.

First of all, the EU and Mercosur bloc signed a draft trade agreement in June 2019, only to have progress stalled until earlier this month attributable to a litany of political and environmental issues. These headwinds included an expected increase in pesticide use and the prospect of further biodiversity loss, concerns about deforestation rates within the Amazon, and human rights concerns regarding indigenous groups.

Machado said France's tacit opposition to the agreement over the past nearly six years had evolved into “proactive attempts to simply throw out the agreement.”

In this context, Machado said that von der Leyen had won a monumental victory for the EU by fighting “through the cracks” of political unrest in France and making it “increasingly difficult” for Paris to commit to the agreement oppose.

“It is much more expensive to push back on a piece of paper than on an idea,” Machado said, adding that it was unlikely France would give you the chance to successfully lead a blocking minority.

A spokesman for the French Foreign Ministry didn’t reply to a request for comment.

Food and Agriculture

Some governments in Europe are believed to be opposing the EU-Mercosur trade deal because they fear the partnership could boost support for domestic far-right political parties ahead of elections in 2025.

“The capitals that oppose the deal are trying to form a coalition that could prevent the council from reaching the required qualified majority,” he said. said Alberto Rizzi, policy fellow on the European Council on Foreign Relations, a think tank.

“A blockade would cause enormous economic and political damage to the EU, at a time when it can ill afford it,” he continued. “European governments cannot pass this test of unity and strength to appease opponents such as European farmers and potential far-right voters.”

Food and agricultural products make up the majority of EU imports from Brazil, Argentina and other Mercosur countries, in response to analysts at Dutch bank ING treasure The total import value of this stuff was 23 billion euros (US$24.13 billion) in 2023.

In a research note published earlier this month, ING analysts said the deal was expected to spice up trade growth between the 2 regions, citing a mixture of larger import quotas and lower or eliminated tariffs on products reminiscent of beef, poultry, sugar beets and soybeans.

This is sowing resentment amongst EU farmers, especially because their counterparts in Mercosur can operate at lower costs.

For example, on December 12, farmers in southwestern France built a wall of 578 bales of hay during an illustration on the road to Auch-Toulouse, with each bale intended to represent French MPs within the country's 577-seat parliament, an extra bale for France's President Emmanuel, in response to media reports Macron.

The obstruction was in protest against the EU-Mercosur trade deal and other domestic political issues.

Environmental activists have also raised the alarm about the opportunity of increased trade in agricultural products, citing the prospect of an influx of EU food imports in return for more EU exports of cars, plastics and pesticides.

“No greenwashed appendices can fix this inherently bad deal,” said Laura Restrepo Alameda of Climate Action Network Latin America. said on December sixth.

“It aims to promote trade in products that lead to deforestation, land grabbing, massive pesticide use, carbon emissions and human rights abuses,” she added.

In response to a CNBC request for comment, EU Commission spokesman Olof Gill said the EU's approach to the deal “is an example of how trade agreements can effectively advance global climate efforts by combining economic cooperation with environmental responsibility.”

Gill cited the inclusion of the most recent trade and sustainability standards and the inclusion of the landmark Paris Agreement as a “key element” of the agreement.

“This will allow the EU to suspend the agreement if Paris Agreement standards are not met, strengthening the role of trade agreements in supporting climate goals,” Gill told CNBC by email.

The biggest winners?

Analysts told CNBC earlier this month that lithium's strategic importance likely played a significant role within the trade deal, while a cut in auto tariffs was also touted as a much-needed boost for Europe's struggling auto industry.

Lithium, sometimes known as “white gold” attributable to its shiny color and high market value, is considered as a vital a part of the worldwide transition away from fossil fuels.

Mercosur countries reminiscent of Argentina, Bolivia and Brazil have large reserves of lithium, while EU demand for this essential raw material is anticipated to extend significantly.

Elizabeth Johnson, head of Brazil research at economic consultancy TS Lombard, said Brazil was likely considered one of the deal's biggest winners.

“The country already accounts for around 80% of all Mercosur exports to the EU, and the bloc is currently Brazil’s second-largest trading partner,” Johnson said in a research note published on December 11.

“Brazilian policymakers hope that the agreement will help expand Brazil's export base with new products and strengthen European investment in Brazil, particularly in the area of ​​energy transition,” she added.

image credit : www.cnbc.com