Art and science illuminate the identical subtle shares in tree branches

Do artists and scientists see the identical in the shape of trees? As a scientist Anyone who studies samples in living beings I start considering.

White, red, yellow, blue and black rectangles that are separated by an irregular grille of black lines.
'Tableau I' by Piet Mondrian, 1921.
Art Museum den Haag

Piet Mondrian was an abstract artist and art theorist of the early twentieth century, which is obsessive about the simplicity and essence of form. Even individuals who have never heard of Mondrian will probably recognize his iconic irregular knights of rectangles.

When I saw Mondrian's “Gray Tree” from 1911, I immediately recognized something about trees that I attempted. By removing all of a very powerful elements in an abstract painting, he showed something that I wanted to clarify with the assistance of physics and fractal geometry.

A tree that only uses dark lines on a gray background.
Gray tree by Piet Mondrian, 1911.
Art Museum den Haag

My research area is mathematical biology. My colleagues and I try to clarify how cruel structures corresponding to veins and arteries, lungs and leaves finely divided their physical shape as a way to efficiently deliver blood, air, water and nutrients.

Basic research within the biology of the branching helps with cardiovascular diseases and cancerdesign Materials that may heal themselves and predict How trees will react to a changing climate. Remations also appear Ants feed patternsPresent Mucus forms And Cities.

The treeless tree

A lonely tree in a green field.
'Polder landscape with Silhouetted Young Tree' by Piet Mondrian, 1900-1901.
Wikimedia Commons

From 1890 to 1912 Mondrian painted dozens of trees. He began with full coloured, realistic trees in context: Trees in a farm or a Trace. Gradually removed LeavesPresent depthPresent Color And finally even branches off his tree paintings. “Gray tree”Use only curved lines of various thicknesses which might be overlaid in apparently random angles. But the image is unmistakably a tree.

How did Mondrian convey the sensation of a tree with so little? The science of the trees can offer some clues.

The science of the branch

A goal of Mathematical biology Should synthesize what scientists know concerning the great diversity of living systems – where there appears to be an exception to each rule – in clear, general principles, ideally with a couple of exceptions. This is such a general principle Evolution Fine Tunes Treelike Structures in living things to make metabolism and respiration as efficiently as possible.

The body fastidiously controls the thickness of vessels within the branch, since deviation from probably the most efficient diameter wastes energy and causes diseases. Like atherosclerosis.

In many cases, corresponding to human blood vesselsThe body exerts much closer control over the diameter than the length. While veins and arteries may take cumbersome routes to soak up the moods of organs and anatomy, their diameter often stays inside 10% of the optimum. The same principle also appears in trees.

The exact calibration of the branch diameter results in a license plate of fractal shapes, that are known as a scale invariance. A scale invariance is a property that applies no matter the scale of an object or a part of an object that you just take a look at. The Skala invariance occurs in trees because trunks, limbs and branches are all branches in the same way and for similar reasons.

Black and white diagram of three computer-generated trees in a row with the values ​​α = 1, α = 2 and α = 3, which show an increasing density of branches.
Trees with different values ​​of the scaling parameter α.
Gao and Newberry/Pas Nexus

The scale invariance within the branch diameter determines how much smaller a link must be than branches and the way much investment a tree makes in a couple of thick branches in comparison with many thin investments. Trees have developed the invariance of the size To transport water, to achieve the sunshine and to contradict gravity and wind load as efficiently as possible

This science of the trees inspired my colleague and me Measure the scaling of the tree branch diameter in art.

The art of the trees

One of my favorite pictures is a carving of a tree from a late moval mosque in India. His survey of trees jogs my memory of Tolkien Tree from Gondor And the human ability to understand the easy great thing about living things.

Tree carved on a stone window screen
Siddi Saiyyed Mosque in Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India, c. 1572.
Shivrekha/Wikimedia Commons

But I also find mathematical inspiration within the Islamic golden ageA time when art, architecture, mathematics and physics. Medieval Islamic architects even decorated buildings infinite non -repeated tile patterns This was not understood by western mathematics Until the twentieth century.

The sparse branches of an old cherry tree in spring
'Cherry Blossoms' by Matsumura Goshun (1752-1811).
Metropolitan Museum of Art

The stylized tree carvings of the Sidi Saiyyed Mosque also follow the Precise system of proportions dictated by the Skala invariance of real trees. This precision of the branch diameter makes an attentive eye and a careful plan – a lot better than I freehand.

In fact, wherever our team checked out trees in great artistic endeavors corresponding to Klimts, “Tree of life“Or Matsumura Goshun”Cherry blossoms“We also found a precise invariance within the diameter of the branches.

“Gray Tree” also realistically captures the natural variation of the branch diameter, even when the painting gives the viewer something else. Would this painting be a tree without realistic scaling?

As to prove the purpose, Mondrian made a subsequent painting the next yr, also with a gray background, curved lines and the identical overall composition and dimensions. Even the position of some lines are the identical.

But in “Bloom apple tree”(1912), all lines are the same thickness. The scaling is gone and thus the tree. Before reading the title, most spectators would not suspect that this is a painting of a tree. But Mondrian's sketches show that there are “blooming apple tree” and “gray tree” The same tree.

The same apple tree as gray tree, but with lines with solid thickness. Most spectators do not notice a tree immediately.
“Apple tree” bloom by Piet Mondrian, 1912.
Art Museum den Haag

The two paintings contain only a couple of elements that might signal a tree – a concentration of lines near the center, lines, the branches or a central trunk and contours that may display the ground or a horizon.

Nevertheless, only “gray tree” has scaling branch diameter. When Mondrian removes the size invariance in “Flowing Apple Tree”, the viewers see fish, scales, dancers, water or just not representative shapes, while the tree is unmistakable in “gray tree”.

Photosynthesis

Mondrian's tree paintings and scientific theory underline the importance of the thickness of trees. Weight When different evidence and argumentation reach the identical conclusions. Art and arithmetic explore each abstract descriptions of the world, and to see in such a way that great art and natural sciences select the identical essential characteristics of trees is satisfactory in beyond what could achieve art or science alone.

As great literature as “The excessive” And “The botany of desire“Show us how trees influence our lives in a way that we frequently don’t notice. The art and science of the trees show how much individuals are fantastic on what is vital for trees. I believe this resonance is one reason why people find fractals and natural landscapes so nice and calming.

All of those denkinia give us recent ways to understand trees.

image credit : theconversation.com