In a court application on Wednesday, lawyers from Elon Musk said that he potentially lucrative conversion into non -profit status.
Musk, who was considered one of the founders of Openai along with Altman in 2019, said his offer was an try to be sure that Openai doesn’t subsume from Microsoft as a substitute of remaining an “open, safety -oriented force for good in Musks. “”
While we do not affect a party to control the company, they work for it and other newspapers and media companies.
When creating its premiere product, Chatgpt, Openai collected, copyrighted content from the entire web to create an app that smoothly repackages this content as its own. Since it is becoming increasingly popular, it threatens to replace exactly the sources of the content with which they were trained at all.
Altman did not recognize Chatgpt without copyrighted content, but the company has not yet compensated these creators for the use of their work. As a result, the owners of this newspaper, together with the New York Times and other Openai, sued them and claim that they used this data illegally to “train” its systems.
In a lot of rich irony, Openai began to whine a few weeks ago when a Chinese rival, Deepseek, attracted sudden attention. Subsequently, Altman's operation claimed that Deepseek may have used data that was generated by Openai technologies in order to convey similar skills to its own rival systems, a process that is known in this area as “distillation”.
We know all too well about the distillation, which defines the dictionary as “extraction of the essential meaning or an important points of something”.
Open AI copied our content, which was created by generations of human work and consisted of stubborn reports, mandatory analyzes and critical thinking. It goes completely on the reality that a large part of this work could not have been done without reporters appearing in real life to ask mighty people the right questions, even if they came for the hills.
We call this journalism, and that is the real social strength for good. If you want to “look deep” for something, contact a newsroom.
Our work was never “open” and for good reasons. We are professionals and many of us have to feed mouths. In addition, we believe that our content had a value and continue to be worth it, and because you read this, you have to.
Whatever the billionaire in the fight for Openai does not be fooled by all the altruism.
The suppliers of artificial intelligence are much more than burners.
They steal the entire barrel.
We are the brewers and we should be compensated.
Originally published:
image credit : www.mercurynews.com