National news
Washington several agency leaders appointed agency leaders asked the federal staff to not comply with Elon Musk's command, to summarize their achievements up to now week or to be faraway from their positions, even doubled his demand over the weekend as a nut.
Her instructions countered Musk's command in large parts of the federal government and demanded the broad authority that President Donald Trump made drastic changes to the world's richest man. The monument serves as one in every of the primary vital tests how far the facility of the musk goes.
When the rule was reversed in your complete federal government, officials of some agencies, including the FBI, shared theirs, the office that coordinate the country's secret services, and the departments for defense ministries, state, energy, health and human services and the safety of the house protection recording Employees not to reply.
Musks E -Mail even reached the inbox of sitting federal judges – that within the judicial department, not in the manager department. The administrative office of the federal courts advised Judges and employees that “this e -mail does not come from the judiciary or the administrative office, and we recommend that we are not taken.”
The public pushback reflects a growing discomfort and in some cases in some cases behind the scenes of the Trump administration in regards to the perception of Musk's unchecked power.
The discomfort runs from lower employees to some cabinet secretaries who’re fed up with justifying certain subtleties of agency policy and attempting to commit unexpected controversy that Musk has lit.
These officials are aware that he has a personal influence on Trump, and so they fear that Musk with X, the social media website he owned by him, people he looks at based on a high -ranking administrative officer as a disability of the civil servant Senior administration.
Hours after a high -ranking official of the Department of Defense was publicly and firmly pushed back on Musk Directive on Sunday afternoon, Musk selected him for retaliation. say about x The undeniable fact that “everyone who has the attitude of this Pentagon official has to look for a new job.”
A one that was still silent in the course of the majority of the weekend was Trump; After posting on social media on Saturday morning that he wanted Musk to be “more aggressive” after which gave up the cleansing of federal staff in a speech hours later, the president had remained silent on this topic on Sunday.
That afternoon, nonetheless, Trump provided a mem, which he said of Musk, and mocked federal employees who had to clarify their duties and achievements, but he didn’t interfere with the conflict between his appointments between the inner government.
Musk's public statements about his cost reduction efforts, that are called Department of Government efficiency, have often expressed open contempt for the federal worker, which incorporates a few of Trump's supporters.
On Sunday afternoon, a few of the setbacks against musk from administrative officials who come to a big a part of the national security system and the law enforcement agencies – became public and explicit.
“The Ministry of Defense is responsible for reviewing the performance of its staff and will carry out each review according to its own procedures” In “For now, please pause a answer.”
Tulsi Gabard, Director of the Office for National Secret Services, ordered all the key services officers not to reply, in a message to secret service officers who were checked by the New York Times.
“In view of the nature of our work, which is naturally sensitive and classified by nature, IC employees should not respond to the OPM -E Mail,” wrote Gabard.
The FBI director Kash Patel wrote in an e -mail to the workers that “the FBI is responsible for all of our review processes about the director's office” and told the workers that they “pause all the answers” in the meanwhile.
Senior staff officers from the state and homeland protection departments also instructed their employees to not react to the e -mail.
In the Ministry of Justice and the FBI, the threatening signals of musk were met with a combination of anger and astonishment that somebody would issue such a blanket demand without sensitive areas akin to criminal investigations, legal confidentiality or a big jury.
Some law enforcement agencies quickly asked the workers to attend for further instructions from managers on Monday before they reply to demand, based on current and former civil servants.
Other departments gave contradictory instructions. The Department of Health and Human Services informed its employees on Sunday morning that they need to follow the directive. An hour later an e -mail from the With Trump's actor From the National Institutes of Health, a subordinate agency asked the workers to claim themselves when answering. Hours later, the health department asked all employees to “pause” the answers to the ultimatum.
On Saturday, Musk published a requirement for presidency employees to summarize their achievements for the week and warned that this isn’t accepted as a resignation. Soon afterwards, the Office for Personnel Management, which the federal worker managed, sent an e -mail wherein officials were asked for a listing of achievements, however it didn’t include the danger of removal since it was not met.
Unions that represented federal employees suggested that Musk's command was not valid. She advised her members to follow her superiors instructions on how and whether to reply to the e -mail.
In a devastating letter on Sunday, Everett B. Kelley, President of the American Federation of Government – shared the biggest federal employment union – the incumbent director of the Office for Human Resources Management that the e -mail to federal employees “clearly illegal” and “was thoughtlessly.”
Kelley demanded that the order have been withdrawn and determined: “By allowing the unchecked and excluded Elon Musk to dictate OPM's actions, you have shown a lack of consideration of the integrity of federal employees and their critical work.”
Several secret services, including the National Security Agency, had warned the workers that answering could by accident risk the apparent contractual work.
Although Musk's original e -mail informed the workers that they mustn’t absorb a classified material.
MP Mike Lawler, Rn.Y., whose seat in 2026 could be amongst essentially the most contested fighting, has aroused doubts in regards to the arrangement when he supported Musk's cost reduction.
“I don't know how it is necessarily feasible,” said Lawler in regards to the ultimatum. “Obviously, many federal employees are in the union contract.”
Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, also criticized Musk's command.
“Our public workforce deserves to be treated with dignity and respect for the unannounced jobs that they carry out,” she wrote in a explanation on social media. “It wasn't the absurd e -mail at the weekend to justify its existence.”
It is unclear which legal basis -Music shots needs to be justified based on the answers to the e -mail, and the White House and the Office of Personal Management, answered questions on the threat from the space.
But Musk – who made similar unconventional demands during his takeover of Twitter, now often known as X as X, insisted on Sunday morning that the order was a “very simple pulse test”.
In numerous contributions, Musk also promoted groundless claims for wage fraud – that a substantial variety of “non -existent” or dead people within the federal worker was employed and that criminals began the fake employees to gather state salary checks.
“They report about an immense fraud,” said Musk in response to a contribution by a supporter who said that “Die Linke flips over a simple e -mail.”
His claims repeat an analogous one that will receive umpteen million dead people. A newer report The general inspector of the social security authority – a watchdog that examined this system for waste, fraud and abuse – stated that “almost not one of the people within the agency database who probably died received payments.
image credit : www.boston.com