Again through the luminous lens on the surface of the fossil, one in all us, one in all us, Sabrina CurranTerred deep air. The V-shaped lines were clearly on the fossil as a consequence of a powerful light that was almost parallel to the bone surface. There was no mistake they meant.
She had already seen her on bones that were slaughtered with stone tools About 1.8 million years agoFrom one place called Dmanisi in Georgia. These were cut markings made by a human ancestor that led a stone tool. After looking at her for eternity – but probably just for a couple of seconds – she turned to our colleagues and said: “Hey … I think I found something.”
What she discovered in 2017 was the primary proof of our team Hominine Battle several animals not less than 1.95 million years ago in Romania in Romania. Before this discovery, these other cut marks from Dmanisi were the oldest well-dated evidence in Eurasia for the presence of hominine-unique direct human ancestors.
From this time, other scientists have registered locations in Eurasia and North Africa with Hominin fossils, stone tools or slaughtered animal bones. Our recently published research Add this story with well -dated, verified evidence that Hominine had spread to this a part of the world about 2 million years ago.
Romanian site with petrified animal bones

Emil Racovițț Institute of Speleology
A small background to Grăunceanu: This open-air website was originally excavated within the Nineteen Sixties, and the researchers found hundreds of fossil animal bones there. It is probably the greatest known Early Pleistocene Locations in East Central Europe. Many of the fossil animal bones are quite complete and were together on the time of excavation after they were positioned in life. The original deposit was called the “bone nest” since the bones were tightly packed.
If you were on the slope around Grăunceanu almost 2 million years ago, this might probably have been known: a river channel that’s surrounded by a forest that fades for deliveries in additional open grass landscapes. Occasionally, the river floods its banks, floods the valley with wealthy soils and delivers nutrients for the plants from which the resident animals feed. Everything pretty familiar until you are taking a better take a look at these animals: ostriches, pangoline, giraffes, saber toothed cats and hyenas-in Europe!
It is the fossil bones of those old animal dwellers who were excavated in Grăunceanu. Unfortunately, many of the excavation records and data data for the web site have been lost. Even without these, the Grăunceanu fossils are so remarkably preserved that they provide a wealth of paleontological information.
Just a few years after we found these first cut brands, our team, including biological anthropologist Claire TerhuneZoo archaeologist Samantha Gogoland paleoanthropologist Chris RobinsonThey spent several weeks to review all 4,524 Grăunceanu fossils rigorously and search for other brands.
We examined all of the surfaces of every fossil bone with a magnifying lens and a low angle. Most of those fossils have a root quetting on them – winding, flat, overlapping markings made by plant roots that grew nearby. But after we saw a linear brand that looked interesting, we had an impression of this brand with tooth shape material.
Sabrina Curran
Confirm that you may have cut markings
We cannot return to a time machine to look at if these markings have been made. Yes, old human butchers who exercise stone tools left markings on the bone. Predators or crocodiles from mammals could also leave markings with sharp teeth. Sediments in rivers could all scratch the bones within the water. Large animals that walk across the landscape could move with their stages and scratch bones.
How can we make certain that you may have cut brands? Here are our employees of the zoo archaeologists employees Michael Pante And Trevor Keevil got here in.
Sabrina Curran
Panne A developed prior to now ten years New method for identification The source of notes on the bones. The first step is to record more precise 3D Optical non -contact 3D profile.
Then compare the 3D form data from the old markings with a reference set of 898 points for contemporary bones made by known processes, including stone tool butchery, carnivore and sediment.
This recent method contributes to the more qualitative, descriptive criteria for a lot of researchers, including our team, to perform marginifications. For example, we take a look at things like Mark location: Is the brand near a muscle binding site where you might look forward to finding a cut brand when a hominin meat removes meat from a bone?
Based on our analyzes, we found that 20 Grăunceanu fossils are marked by cuts, with eight displaying with high confidence-cut markings. Most of those brands are positioned on fossils of hoof animals, including some deer; One is a small carnivores. If we are able to discover the bone type, the cut markings are all the time on anatomical spots with cutting meat bones.
Dating the page
While the present fossil species can provide us with a gross age estimate of the situation More detailed age information. This technique is predicated on the undeniable fact that naturally occurring uranium drops over long but known periods to be able to finally turn into lead. Geologists use the ratio of those two elements resembling a radiometric clock to find out how old is something.
If one in all us Virgil Drăgușinasked Geochemist Jon Woodhead He hesitated to make use of the U-PB dating to be able to estimate the age of the Grăunceanu fossils based on several small dentists. The teeth are often not suitable for this dating technique. But he agreed to a test run, and to his surprise the teeth that he tried worked thoroughly.
Together along with his colleague John HellstromThey calculated a rather more precise date for the web site. We now know that the Grăunceanu location is older than 1.95 million years.
All of this data composed very well-calibrated and narrowly grouped data of the copies in addition to not less than 20 cut bones, which were verified each by qualitative and quantitative methods-very reliable evidence that hominine in Eurasia was actually present not less than 1.95 million years ago, although there aren’t any hominin brossilies from Grăcunnu from Hominin-Brossilen from Grientena gives.

EMI was I
Sometimes after we leaf through our lives, it almost feels as if we are able to fit into the past. This is inconceivable – but we are able to put together evidence to be able to paint a clearer picture of what happened in Grăunceanu prior to now.
Now that we imagine the view 1.95 million years ago, we see scenes wherein deer rigorously drink from the river, majestic mammoths in the space, a herd of horses, the pastures, a cat that traces an awesome monkey, a bear that teaches her boy to hunt … and a small group of Hominins who beats you.
image credit : theconversation.com
Leave a Reply