Massachusetts lawmakers did not pass a bill on Revolution Stadium

New England Revolution

For fans of the Revolution, who’ve been waiting hopefully for years for the possible construction of their very own football stadium within the Boston area, the wait appears to be removed from over.

As a part of a 23-hour marathon to conclude the official session of the Massachusetts Legislature – which lasted until Thursday, 9:57 a.m.nearly 10 hours after the official deadline of midnight on July 31 – state lawmakers were unable to achieve agreement on a wide range of issues, including passage of a sweeping economic development bill.

Included in the large bill was a special section that might have removed the special “Designated Port Area” from a 43-acre parcel of land at 173 Alford St. in Everett, the positioning of a defunct power plant (currently owned by Wynn Resorts). If the DPA had been removed, it will have cleared the best way for the Kraft Group soccer team to maneuver forward with the possible construction of a 25,000-seat stadium along the waterfront.

Although the bill was included in a Senate version of the bill (which passed in July), the House of Representatives balked at it, and the next Mediation Committee did not reconcile the 2 versions before the tip of the formal session.

The Economic Development Act was removed from the one law that remained dead within the water by legislators who disagreed about Range of topics in a lengthy final effort of the session.

But with the rejection of the Economic Development Act, the revolution's latest stadium project is on shaky ground.

Technically, the stadium language might be resubmitted as a standalone bill (which it originally was initially of the 12 months). But after the formal meeting has been concluded, all that is required is the opposition of 1 only legislator to dam the whole law (in accordance with the principles of the informal meeting).

Since there was apparently opposition to the planned stadium from Boston – with representatives from TD Garden and Fenway Park in opposition to a different potential local concert venue – the road to adoption via an off-the-cuff meeting is prone to be rocky.

Nevertheless, the creator of the unique bill for Everett Stadium in 2024 just isn’t giving up.

State Senator Sal DiDomenico (whose district includes Everett) made a temporary comment after the official meeting concluded on Thursday.

“I am committed to continuing to try to find a way to move forward on this issue, and over the next few days we will be reviewing that process and that path,” Senator DiDomenico said. in accordance with Chris Lisinski of the State House News Service“I'm not giving up. I'm committed and believe that this is the right thing for my community and my region.”