The founders of Internet search and digital promoting giant Google wrote in a 1998 document that the goals of internet advertising “do not always” align with useful Internet search results.
Now that Google has been found to have an illegal search monopoly, critics claim that the corporate that has change into synonymous with Internet search, as Sergey Brin and Larry Page fearedhas shifted “away from the needs of consumers.”
Google has “become greedy,” said well-known technology industry critic Ed Zitron in an interview.
Today, once you type a search term into Google, you frequently find relevant information, but you furthermore may get a page of promoting, followed by links to web sites with content designed to convert views and clicks into money. Recent research shows that e-commerce sites like Amazon and crowdsourcing sites like Reddit and Google's own YouTube are increasingly appearing in search results.
Google didn’t reply to questions on its search product and the federal court's monopoly ruling. In a blog post this 12 months, the corporate said it has used “advanced spam defense systems” for many years and in 2022 began adjusting its website rating systems to “reduce unhelpful, unoriginal content and keep it at a very low level” while “algorithmic improvements” would help “surface the most helpful information.”
Judge Amit P. Mehta's landmark monopoly ruling within the Justice Department's case against Google last month has put the Mountain View company's hugely popular search engine within the highlight. Mehta, of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, said Google's conclusion in a 2020 study that it will not lose search revenue if it drastically reduced search quality was evidence of an illegal monopoly.
On September 6, Mehta will begin the following phase of the U.S. Justice Department's case against Google, which he says controls not less than 90 percent of the U.S. web search market. The goal is to strip Google of its monopoly on the search engine. In his 277-page ruling, the judge focused on the corporate's payments to firms like Apple and Samsung to make Google the default search engine. He said, “Most devices in the U.S. come pre-installed with Google only.”
Critics argue that the corporate’s freedom from competition allows it to neglect quality, while money – 238 billion US dollars in promoting revenue last 12 months – rolls in.
Zitron, CEO of San Francisco public relations firm EZPR and host of the iHeart podcast “Better Offline,” said internal Google emails revealed within the lawsuit suggested that a change in top-level management led to less user-friendly changes to look results.
According to the emails, Google's top managers declared a “Code Yellow” emergency five years ago due to declining search growth and the high promoting revenues related to it. While Google's accountants searched for solutions, search engine managers anxious concerning the conflict identified by founders Brin and Page. Search engine boss Ben Gomes complained that his department was being pushed “too close to the money” and was “too busy with advertising for the good of the product and the company.”
Slightly over a 12 months later, Google combined search and promoting right into a single unit under promoting chief Prabhakar Raghavan. Gomes, who had spent twenty years constructing the search function, was relegated to education initiatives.
Google has began prioritizing the variety of searches over the standard of results “so they can show you as many ads as possible,” Zitron claimed.
The company's search results page has change into cluttered lately with ads marked as “sponsored” that don't help the user but are lucrative for Google. Spammers and marketers use keywords and content tricks to push certain sites higher in the outcomes, leaving Google to play catch-up while users pay in wasted time and frustration.
“I've never seen so many people complaining or raising issues about Google's results as I have in the last year,” said Lily Ray, vice chairman of promoting agency Amsive, which researches Google search trends. “I see a ton of spam in Google search results. It's never been more obvious to me.”
Mehta said “some evidence” showed Google's search spending had declined, and on the rare occasions when competition emerged, the corporate was quick to take a position in improvements. But the judge said innovations could increase its already dominant market share, calling Google the “highest quality search engine” within the technology industry.
But Christopher Hockett, an associate professor at UC Berkeley's law school, said: “The rationale behind all this is that the quality would be higher if there was more competition.”
Research from Illinois-based Amsive shows that Google's updates lately have made certain kinds of sites less visible. These include sites that use stock images or photos from social media, present AI-generated content that lacks expertise, or contain intrusive promoting or a lot of cash-per-click links. When it involves product search, nevertheless, many high-ranking product comparison sites make cash when a user clicks through to a brand's site to buy. Or, as Ray noted, they’re “pay-to-play” businesses that charge brands money to be listed on their site.
The changes Google made this 12 months appear to have pushed product review sites down while e-commerce stores, particularly Amazon, appear near the highest, often together with YouTube, Amsive said. The New York Times' popular website Wirecutter, whose product reviews are based on extensive testing, now often ranks behind web forums Reddit and Quora for top product results, Ray said.
Reddit's visibility has increased by greater than 1,000% this 12 months in comparison with 2023, Amsive found. In July 2023, a Google seek for “how to teach a boy to use the potty” only returned pregnancy and medical sites and YouTube in the highest 10 results, with the Mayo Clinic at No. 1. In July of this 12 months, a five-year-old Reddit post rose from No. 50 to No. 2, landing ahead of “authoritative sites like the Mayo Clinic,” Amsive reported.
Google could have developed technology to seek out probably the most helpful answers to questions, but apparently decided to “just put Reddit there,” Zitron said.
Thousands of layoffs at Google lately have eroded institutional knowledge in search, Zitron said, and “they may have fired so many people that the thing no longer works.”
Google's race to compete within the generative AI hype that began with the discharge of ChatGPT in 2022 “might explain why some things have fallen by the wayside in search,” Ray said. She added, “They have a monopoly. They are the default search engine. Their stock is going up and up. What incentive do they have to change that?”
Barry Schwartz, CEO of New York-based software company RustyBrick and editor of the blogs Search Engine Land and Search Engine Roundtable, said Google is always innovating and experimenting with search. “I probably see five to 10 new things a day in terms of testing,” Schwartz said. “Probably one of their main things they focus on is making sure the content in the search results is useful.”
Still, Schwartz said, “If Google was under competitive pressure and had to do more, I think it would.”
Originally published:
image credit : www.mercurynews.com