Curious Kids is a show for teenagers of all ages. If you’ve got a matter you'd like an authority to reply, send it to curiouskidsus@theconversation.com.
Can a college prohibit a toddler from praying or must schools accommodate children of certain faiths? – Isaac T., 17, Flint, Michigan
Can you imagine starting a prayer together with your class day-after-day at college that you could not imagine in? In the Nineteen Fifties, many teachers led the category in public prayer, and these prayers often got here from a faith. In 1962, the US Supreme Court ruled that school-sponsored prayers within the classroom violate the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
But that doesn't mean that students aren't allowed to hope during school hours. The ban on communal school prayer is balanced by one other right under the First Amendment: the liberty to exercise one's religion. As a law professor specializing in law and religion, I actually have studied how the First Amendment applies in the varsity context.
Freedom of faith was necessary to the framers of the US Constitution. That is why the First Amendment comprises two separate provisions coping with religion: the Establishment clause and the liberty of faith clause.
The Establishment Clause prohibits the federal government from “establishing” a faith. That is, the federal government cannot establish a national religion, promote or favor one religion over one other, or let you know what religion you could follow.
The Free Exercise Clause states that Congress cannot make a law prohibiting the “free exercise of religion”: As residents, we now have the fitting to practice the faith of our selecting. The government cannot, in principle, interfere with the exercise of our religion so long as it is affordable.
These rights sometimes conflict in on a regular basis school life. Recently, the Supreme Court ruled that a Football coach allowed to hope publiclyon a college football field – but on this case the coach prayed after the sport was over. This case was heavily criticized, and the Supreme Court didn’t explain what rules apply to other situations.
Students have the fitting to hope at school, inside certain limits. But the fitting of 1 student to hope must not affect the rights of other students. If you wanted to guide the category in prayer, start praying during class time, or denounce the teacher because the devil, you may not do this. The school has a Right to regulate teachingThis can result in students not praying out loud during class.
However, if a student desires to say grace before meals or pray before class or between classes, that is protected by the Constitution. However, if a student desires to say a silent prayer at any time, including during class – for instance, before an exam – that is their right. The Constitution doesn’t restrict private thoughts.
Accommodation not required
If a rule or law applies equally to everyone, the Free Exercise Clause doesn’t require a state or public school to make exceptions to accommodate an individual's religious practices. According to the Supreme Court.
In practice, public school students who need an exception are often granted one. Many states have interpreted their constitutions or enacted laws that require schools to work with students to permit them to practice their faith while still meeting class requirements. In most faculties, an observant Jewish student is permitted to hope 3 times a day facing Jerusalem, or a Muslim student to hope five times a day facing Mecca. For example, they could be given a brief recess during class or a schedule that permits time outside of sophistication for prayer.
FatCamera/E+ via Getty Images
Reasons for rejection
Sometimes a state—or a public school—has a “compelling interest,” that’s, a extremely strong reason to inform people they can not follow their religious beliefs. For example, the state's interest in ensuring that a seriously unwell child receives medical care is a powerful enough reason to disclaim the fitting to free exercise of faith to folks who imagine that searching for medical care is against God's will, even when it means the death of their child.
Even if there are really good reasons for a law or rule, the state – or the varsity – must exhibit that there isn’t any other option to achieve the identical result that doesn’t have as great an impact on religious practice. For example, if parents refuse just one type of medical treatment on religious grounds, but there may be one other treatment that would help their child just as well, the state may not intervene.
One final note: The First Amendment to the Constitution applies to government motion. Because public schools are funded by the state, their actions are considered government motion. Private schools generally don’t receive government funding, so the First Amendment's protections don’t apply. This is why, for instance, a Catholic school can require all students to attend mass.
Hey, curious kids! Do you’ve got a matter you'd like an authority to reply? Ask an adult to send your query to CuriousKidsUS@theconversation.com. Please tell us your name, age and the town you reside in.
And since curiosity knows no age limit, adults can take part too. Let us know what interests you. We can't answer every query, but we'll do our greatest.
image credit : theconversation.com