Self-forgiveness is greater than self-consolation – a philosopher explains

With the upcoming Jewish holidays that begin with Rosh Hashanah and end with Yom Kippur, the subject of forgiveness keeps coming to mind.

The 10 days from Rosh Hashanah to Yom Kippur are known in Jewish tradition as Days of repentanceor the Days of Awe. During this time, Jews who observe the vacations implore God to answer their sins with grace, while at the identical time express regret from anyone they could have wronged previously yr.

Most conversations about forgiveness deal with the importance and value of forgiving others. Douglas Stewart, an academic philosopher who has studied forgiveness extensively, writes that forgiveness requires a willingness to let go of our negative emotions or resentment and as an alternative adopt a more generous and compassionate attitude toward our wrongdoers.

Other philosophers have identified that the advantages of forgiveness include overcoming resentment, Restoring relationships and to go away a fallacious previously – without revenge. Therefore, forgiveness needs to be seen as morally precious and admirable.

But what about self-forgiveness? Does it have moral value or is it just something we do to make ourselves feel higher? And what’s self-forgiveness anyway?

As a philosopher of educationa few of my own research has wrestled with these questions.

A man with white hair and a red polo shirt throws small pieces of white bread over a wooden bridge into a stream below.
During Tashlich, a ceremony on Rosh Hashanah, people symbolically put away their sins by throwing pieces of bread into running water.
Bill Greene/The Boston Globe via Getty Images

Defining self-forgiveness

Self-forgiveness means processing painful feelings comparable to guilt, shame and deep disappointment in ourselves. It includes Changing negative attitudescomparable to contempt, anger and shame, into more positive emotions comparable to respect and humility.

However, it is vital to acknowledge that a wrongdoer cannot simply reject shame: he must face it. Moral philosophers comparable to Byron Williston claim that individuals who’ve done great fallacious to others, for instance by betraying a loved one, must feel shame and take responsibility for his or her actions – for instance, by asking for forgiveness. Otherwise, an attempt at self-forgiveness might be not useful.

Finally, we must keep in mind that self-forgiveness doesn’t mean that somebody has erased all negative feelings they’ve toward themselves or that they’re done with self-blame. This could be an inconceivable goal.

Rather Philosopher Robin Dillon identifiedSelf-forgiveness implies that one isn’t any longer consumed or overwhelmed by those negative feelings. In short, it is feasible to forgive ourselves and still take a look at ourselves with a discerning and important eye.

Moral development

However, the trail to this is just not easy. Self-forgiveness requires a rigorous technique of working through wrongdoing.

Accordingly Ethicist Margaret Holmgrenthis process includes a minimum of 4 steps: Acknowledging that what we did was fallacious; coming to terms with why it was fallacious; allowing ourselves to feel grief and resentment toward ourselves for hurting one other person; and at last, making a sincere effort to correct the attitudes that led to the harmful act and to make amends to the victim.

In other words, addressing negative emotions, attitudes, and behavior patterns is crucial before attempting to repair relationships with others. Only once we are capable of loosen the preoccupation with guilt and shame and truly forgive ourselves can we meaningfully contribute to relationships as liberated and equal partners—especially in existing relationships, comparable to with family and friends.

A close up of two people holding hands.
Self-forgiveness is just not just selfish.
Jasmin Merdan/Moment via Getty Images

Of course, there are cases where the crime is so great, comparable to genocide, that no individual is capable of make full reparation or adequately apologize for the fallacious.

There are also times when an apology is inconceivable. Perhaps the victims are dead; perhaps a direct apology would re-traumatize them or do more harm than good.

In these cases, I might argue, an offender can still attempt to work toward self-forgiveness – by recognizing not only the victim’s intrinsic value, but additionally his own, no matter his ability to make amends. This in itself is moral growth: you acknowledge that neither is a mere object that will be manipulated or abused.

The crucial point, in my view, is that the technique of self-forgiveness is morally advantageousNot only can it liberate individuals who are likely to always blame themselves, but it might probably also improve their ability to interact ethically with others – to confess wrongdoing while affirming their very own value.

Most people have experienced a minimum of one situation where they’ve caused pain to someone and realized that their words or actions have caused harm. In such situations, we regularly feel ashamed and take a look at to apologize or make amends.

However, I hope that in these high holidays we don’t forget that self-forgiveness must also be considered essential. Moral development means a process through which our self-confidence and character mature. Admitting wrongdoing and experiencing shame, followed by self-forgiveness, are essential to this process.

image credit : theconversation.com