About a 12 months ago, a coyote sneaked into the chicken coop at Meredith Morris's Seattle home and indulged in a meal of feathers. Unsure the right way to break the news of the bird's death to her children, Morris turned to artificial intelligence to seek out the appropriate words.
Morris, director and chief scientist of human-AI interaction research at Google, took some creative liberties when she launched a generative AI program to praise her chicken. She ended up with the script for a play in memory of Amelia Eggheart – and was keen to further explore how AI could possibly be used to commemorate the dead.
“What she sent me was hysterical,” said Jed Brubaker, a professor on the University of Colorado Boulder and Morris’s co-researcher. “It was a stage play with lighting directions that began with the words, ‘We gather today to honor the memory of Amelia Eggheart.’ So we started talking about what was going on in that area.”
“Generative spirits” – AI chatbots based on the information of the dead – are a spotlight of Brubaker and Morris’ research. They just received $75,000 in funding from Google to check how we are able to best use AI to maintain our deceased family members alive within the digital realm.
“We anticipate that it could become common practice within our lifetime for people to develop a custom AI agent to interact with loved ones and/or the broader world after death,” Morris and Brubaker wrote in her latest article: “Generative Minds: Anticipating Benefits and Risks of AI Afterlives.”
Brubaker studied this Intersections of death and technology for 15 years. After his grandfather died, he wondered if, as a substitute of scrolling through his Facebook memorial page, he would look if he could sit down and let his grandfather tell him in virtual reality concerning the stories that social media -Flood platform.
With the emergence of generative artificial intelligence, which might create stories based on prompts and data, Brubaker knew it was only a matter of time before people would start uploading information – emails, to cloud storage stored data, digitized diary entries, text messages, social media posts – of their deceased family and friends to create chatbots that not only know personal information concerning the deceased, but can even mimic their speech.
While this all feels a bit dystopian, Brubaker says it's an inevitable results of our technological capabilities and that research can assist make essentially the most ethical and practical push into this macabre multimedia territory.
“There can be data sets and folks will use AI to grasp those data sets, and unless someone really insists that each one their data be deleted, the query is whether or not we find yourself in a 'Black Mirror' scenario or not “'has less importance' with data and has more to do with how it's used and how we present it to people,” Brubaker said, referring to the dark British television series that always shines a highlight on rogue technology.
However, there are already programs that use AI to let people refer to digitized versions of the dead:
- AI session boasts, “Our revolutionary AI technology restores the essence of people who have left our world and gives you the ability to have heartfelt conversations with them through an easy-to-use chat interface.”
- With replicaYou can create your personal AI companion “who is eager to learn and wants to see the world through your eyes”
- In re;memory“You can find comfort in expressing your love and forgiveness and building a bridge to the cherished moments that are dear to you.”
- And then there's the Dadbot from a number of years ago, during which a His son documented his experience and gave his dying father artificial immortality
As AI and its capabilities grow to be more mainstream, Brubaker and his fellow researchers are studying essentially the most appropriate user experience for communicating with a man-made representation of a deceased person.
For example, if Brubaker uploads his grandfather's data and asks the chatbot what his grandfather's favorite color is, should the bot respond with “His favorite color was green” or “My favorite color is green”?
“Does the spirit represent the person or does it reincarnate them?” Brubaker said.
You're unsure yet.
As a part of their research, Brubaker and his team work with most people, but additionally with individuals who have lost family members, death doulas and folks in palliative care.
Ashley Harvey, a former grief counselor and current professor at Colorado State University who teaches a course called “Death, Dying and Grief,” said she sees potential benefits and downsides to the ghostly chatbots.
Everyone grieves in a different way, she said.
Harvey said American culture has shifted in recent many years toward constructing lasting bonds with deceased family members somewhat than insisting on moving on quickly. Harvey could imagine that a generative spirit became a technique to keep that bond alive.
“At the same time, there are some tasks that grieving people must accomplish, and that is accepting the reality of the loss and experiencing the pain of the loss,” Harvey said. “If a generative mind interferes with this process – if we don't really accept that our loved one has died and can't really feel the pain or adapt to the world without them, then we might worry a little.”
Harvey suggested the thought of a ghostly chatbot to her students. While she portrayed it positively as an interesting development in her field, she said her students reacted negatively.
“They continued to use the word 'humanity,'” Harvey said. “There is no humanity, soul or spirit in the bot, and they thought it might be confusing or detrimental to grief.”
Brubaker acknowledges that there could possibly be abuse or inappropriate functions that might increase grief. Push notifications from beyond the grave, for instance, seem intrusive.
“When people are bereft, there's a really important principle in grief literacy that people have control over when and how they engage with painful memories,” Brubaker said. “It's nice to have a scrapbook of old memories, but you can go to the bookshelf and pull it down if you want.”
But he said knee-jerk reactions against the technology should suggest it's an idea value exploring further.
According to Brubaker, there’s a movement in grief literacy that recognizes that isolation and suppression of grief are harmful and that selecting to grieve for a time period after which move on does more harm than good.
In addition, people all the time talked to the dead and gave them a memorial, said Brubaker.
“If we look at this from a clinical perspective, it could be a problem if the time spent with the technology is persistent, disruptive and inappropriate,” Brubaker said, noting that for this reason he cares concerning the user experience. “It’s really important to me that the user or person interacting with the generative mind is in control.”
The Google grant will explore questions equivalent to whether a generative mind needs to be static or evolve over time, and when it might be appropriate for the mind to take an motion – equivalent to a notification – or remain passive.
“Entire companies and industries are emerging, and we can stick our heads in the ground or find the right way to do it.”
Originally published:
image credit : www.mercurynews.com