Corporate social responsibility disclosures are a double-edged sword, recent research shows

I hope to win over customers and firms Amazon To zoom have taken praise their good deeds in corporate social responsibility reports.

CSR reports allow corporations to focus on what they’ve done for staff, consumers, communities and the environment – essentially all of their goals beyond just making a profit. Research shows that CSR statements are linked to this increasing sales.

As Marketing professorI believed this raised an interesting query: When corporations are successful with CSR disclosures, do they attract recent customers – or do their additional sales come solely from their existing base?

In one current study from several hundred Chinese corporations, a colleague and I put the query to the test. We found that CSR disclosure reduces an organization's dependence on existing customers by 2.1%.

This is sweet news for corporations. This implies that these additional sales come from recent customers who are literally impressed with the corporate's CSR efforts.

But the outcomes weren’t all positive.

In order to sell more products, corporations generally must buy more supplies. So a logical follow-up query is: Does an organization's CSR disclosure result in purchases from recent suppliers?

In fact, we found the alternative. Companies that published CSR disclosures appeared to discourage recent suppliers. This is probably going because when an organization chooses to prioritize social responsibility, suppliers often bear the prices.

Dependence on suppliers is related to costs for corporations. When suppliers know that an organization is determined by them, they have a tendency to demand payment in money reasonably than credit. This can harm an organization since it now has less money for investments.

While CSR reports impress customers, they appear to harass suppliers – and that comes at a price.

Why it matters

Previous research has shown that CSR disclosures can increase sales. However, it was unclear for a very long time whether these additional sales got here from old or newly acquired customers. Our work creates clarity that corporations can use of their decision-making.

The results are also of interest to lawmakers, regulators and company responsibility advocates who’re discussing making CSR reporting mandatory.

The United States doesn’t require corporations to publish CSR reports, but some countries do. One of those is China, which in 2008 mandated that each one listed corporations submit annual CSR reports starting in 2009. This set the stage for the virtually natural experiment we conducted.

Interestingly, the US Securities and Exchange Commission has also reportedly done this taken under consideration adopt a type of corporate social responsibility Reporting requirement. Because there are not any requirements, many American corporations will proceed to voluntarily report on their CSR.

In other words, the necessity for empirical evidence on the prices and advantages of CSR disclosure is bigger than ever.

What's next?

The increasing incidence of extreme weather events And weather-related deaths and injuries sparked my interest in environmental responsibility. I actually have two ongoing research projects.

First, I exploit an organization's public disclosures to measure its environmental risks and the actions it has taken to mitigate them. Second, I examine how CEO incentives influence a firm's environmental disclosure, activities, and spending—or lack thereof.

image credit : theconversation.com