Americans who felt most vulnerable within the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic viewed Republicans as an infection risk, resulting in greater disgust and avoidance of them—no matter their very own political party. Even Republicans who felt vulnerable became more distrustful of other Republicans. This is a Findings from a study we recently published within the journal American Psychologist and has vital implications for understanding a fundamental feature of human illness psychology.
Many Republican politicians and supporters, in comparison with their Democratic counterparts, downplayed the specter of COVID-19 to public and private health and opposed mask-wearing and social distancing. These attitudes and actions appear to have made political affiliation a brand new indicator of potential infection risk.
This is an example of what scientists call Behavioral immune system at work.
Why it is necessary
Most persons are acquainted with the physiological immune system, which is how your body fights disease after an infection by activating defense mechanisms comparable to fever and cough.
In contrast, your behavioral immune system tries to guard you from infection. It looks for recognizable cues related to an infectious disease – comparable to coughs and other people's open wounds. It then organizes feelings comparable to disgust and behaviors comparable to distancing that show you how to avoid contagious people. These reactions probably occur without conscious awareness or intention.
Scientists have learned lots about this process, but some vital questions remain unanswered. As psychology ResearchersWe were focused on how the behavioral immune system can quickly adapt to recent cues regarding infectivity and changing risks.
How we work
Starting in April 2020, shortly after the primary COVID-19 lockdowns began, our team followed a nationally representative sample of over 1,100 Americans for about eight months. This was a time of great unpredictability, and there was no vaccine.
Every eight weeks, we asked participants in a web-based survey about their motivation to avoid illness and their attitudes toward different groups, including Republicans and Democrats. Because COVID-19 infection rates fluctuated over the eight months of our study, we were in a position to observe changes in the identical person's motivation over time and their evolving views toward political partisans.
Ko et al., 2024
We found that Americans who were highly motivated to avoid disease, and whose motivation increased as infection rates rose, perceived Republicans as a greater risk of infection than Democrats. They also reported more dislike and avoidance toward Republicans. These patterns were consistent across respondents' political affiliations, even after accounting for people's strong tendency to favor their very own party and dislike the opposing party.
What other research is being carried out
An unexpected twist gives these findings much more weight.
Previous studies show that Political conservatives are inclined to be more vigilant about disease than political liberals. This vigilance is a approach to protect themselves and their communities from external threats. In addition, Americans are inclined to Favor conservatives in elections during disease outbreaksThe party political response to the COVID-19 pandemic was due to this fact different than expected.
The incontrovertible fact that our respondents used Republican affiliation as an indication of potential infection risk, despite its typically conservative tendencies, shows how flexible the behavioral immune system could be. It was in a position to learn and use a brand new cue of perceived infection risk—on this case, political affiliation—in response to a rapidly changing environment. We also saw that the behavioral immune system can adapt to real-world changes in infection risk over time.
image credit : theconversation.com