By MARK SHERMAN Associated Press
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Tuesday will hear the primary of two cases that might impact the prosecution of former President Donald Trump over his efforts to overturn his 2020 election defeat Capitol riot are also at stake.
The former president and presumptive candidate for the Republican nomination in 2024 faces two charges within the case he brought Special Agent Jack Smith In Washington, this might be overturned with a positive ruling from the very best court within the land. Next week, the justices will debate whether Trump enjoys “absolute immunity” from prosecution within the case, a proposal to this point rejected by two lower courts.
Trump, the primary former U.S. president to face charges, is on trial on hush-money charges in New York and has also been charged with election interference in Georgia and misuse of classified documents in Florida.
The court is hearing an appeal in Tuesday's case Joseph Fischera former Pennsylvania police officer who was charged with seven counts, including obstruction, for his actions on January 6, 2021 a mob of Trump supporters stormed the Capitol to stop Democrat Biden from taking the White House. Fischer's lawyers argue that the fees don’t concern his conduct.
The obstruction charge, which carries a sentence of as much as 20 years in prison, is amongst probably the most common crimes brought in the huge federal prosecution following the deadly riot.
About 170 Jan. 6 defendants were convicted of obstructing or conspiring to obstruct the Jan. 6 joint session of Congress, including the leaders of two far-right groups, the Proud Boys and Oath Keepers. Sentencing for some defendants was postponed until judges ruled on the matter.
Some rioters have even won early release while the appeal is pending because they fear they might find yourself in prison longer than they need to if the Supreme Court rules against the Justice Department. This includes Kevin Seefried, a Delaware man who threatened a black police officer with a pole attached to a Confederate battle flag as he stormed the Capitol. Seefried was sentenced to a few years in prison last yr, but a judge recently ordered his release after a yr of his sentence while he awaited the Supreme Court's decision.
At the guts of the Supreme Court case is whether or not the anti-disability provision of a law passed in 2002 in response to the Enron Corp. financial scandal. brought down, was issued, might be applied against the defendants of January sixth.
Fischer's lawyers argue that the availability is meant to shut a loophole in criminal law and stop the destruction of records in response to an investigation. Until the Capitol riot, they told the court, every criminal case by which the availability was used had involved allegations of destruction or other tampering with records.
But the federal government says the opposite side is reading the law too narrowly, arguing it serves “as a catch-all offense designed to ensure full coverage of all forms of corrupt obstruction of an official proceeding,” including Fischer's “alleged conduct in engaging in a violent insurrection.” “. disrupt the joint session of Congress certifying the results of the presidential election.”
Smith has individually argued within the immunity case that the obstruction charge against Trump is valid whatever the end result of Fischer's case.
Most of the lower court judges who spoke on the matter let the fees stand. Among them, Trump-appointed U.S. District Judge Dabney Friedrich wrote that “laws often transcend the primary evil that underlies them.”
But U.S. District Judge Carl Nichols, one other Trump appointee, dismissed charges against Fischer and two other defendants, saying prosecutors had gone too far. A divided panel of the federal appeals court in Washington reinstated the fees before the Supreme Court agreed to take up the case.
While not necessary to the Supreme Court case, each side present vastly different accounts of Fischer's actions on January sixth. Fischer's lawyers say he was “not part of the mob” that forced lawmakers to flee the House and Senate chambers. He entered the Capitol after Congress resigned. The weight of the gang pushed Fischer right into a line of cops inside, a court filing said.
Sen. Tom Cotton of Arkansas and Reps. Jim Jordan of Ohio, Lauren Boebert of Colorado, Matt Gaetz of Florida and Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia are amongst 23 Republican members of Congress who say the federal government's use of the obstruction charge “poses an unacceptable risk represents”. politicized prosecutions. Only a transparent rebuke from this court will stop the madness.”
According to the Justice Department, Fischer might be heard on video screaming “Charge!” before pushing his way through a crowd and “crashing into the police line”. Prosecutors also cited text messages Fischer sent before Jan. 6 saying violence could ensue, in addition to social media posts after the riot by which he wrote: “We have them Police pushed back about 25 feet.”
More than 1,350 people have been charged with federal crimes related to the Capitol riot. About 1,000 of them have pleaded guilty or been convicted after a trial by a jury or judge.
Associated Press writers Alanna Durkin Richer in Washington and Michael Kunzelman in Silver Spring, Maryland, contributed to this report.
image credit : www.mercurynews.com